If you can believe it, we can laugh at it!
This is misleading. I am not a fan of the Salvation Army, simply because I only donate to charities that are completely without religious affiliations on principle.
However, this demonizes the Salvation Army when the truth is less clear.
First, the paper pictures is factually wrong. There aren’t “tens of thousands of soup kitchens” in New York. There are tens of thousands of people who use homeless shelters and soup kitchens. It was this error that made me investigate further.
Second, on the Salvation Army web site, they state:
“The Salvation Army opposes any discrimination, marginalization or persecution of any person. There is no scriptural support for demeaning or mistreating anyone for any reason including his or her sexual orientation. We stand firmly upon our mission to meet human needs in His name without discrimination.”
I’m not an expert on the Salvation Army’s policies and what they have done. Maybe it’s true that they enacted policies harmful to gay people in spite of their stated policies. But in any case it seems to me that the paper pictured here is creating a straw man to burn in effigy, and we need less of that when trying to promote more rational thinking.
You can say anything on a Web site. What does the Salvation Army do?
In their position statements, the Salvation Army describes marriage as “one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others”. Their statement on homosexuality says:
Scripture opposes homosexual practices by direct comment and also by clearly implied disapproval. The Bible treats such practices as self-evidently abnormal. … Attempts to establish or promote such relationships as viable alternatives to heterosexually-based family life do not conform to God’s will for society.
They go on to declare that sexually active gay people are ineligible for the Salvation Army, and call for “a lifestyle built upon celibacy and self-restraint”.
These aren’t just internal matters of church policy, either. The Salvation Army has involved itself in the political arena as well.
– In 1986, the Salvation Army of New Zealand assisted in a petition drive against a law to repeal the country’s ban on homosexuality.
– In 1998, the Salvation Army withdrew from $3.5 million in contracts with San Francisco because of the city’s requirement for contractors to extend benefits to the same-sex partners of employees. As a result, shelters, food services, and drug rehab programs in the city all suffered cutbacks.
– In 2000, the Salvation Army of Scotland spoke out against the proposed repeal of Section 28, which prohibited any discussion in schools of the “acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship”.
– In 2001, the Salvation Army extended benefits to the same-sex partners of its employees, only to reverse this policy after outcry from the Christian right.
– Also in 2001, the Washington Post reported that the Salvation Army had been in discussions with the Bush administration, which had committed to issuing a regulation exempting the Salvation Army from any state or local laws that prohibited employment discrimination based on sexuality. The administration refused to issue such a regulation after their dealings were publicly exposed.
– In 2004, the Salvation Army in New York City once again threatened to close all of its services in the city due to a law requiring contractors to provide equal benefits to same-sex partners.
– And in 2012, a media relations director with the Salvation Army of Australia stated on a radio show that it was part of their “belief system” and “Christian doctrine” that gay people should die.
From Zinnia Jones, freethoughtblogs.com
As always, the religious like to claim persecution when they are caught persecuting or prevented from persecuting others. They are all sick, judgmental, unforgiving hypocrites.
You must be logged in to post a comment.